Academic Regulations: Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences
| Final Award | Doctor of Philosophy |
| with exit awards of: | |
| Master of Philosophy (MPhil) | |
| Programme(s) | PhD Quantum Technology Engineering (CDT-QTE) |
| Last modified | April 2025 |
The Academic Regulations apply to and regulate the programme(s) listed above.
On occasion, programmes can be exempted from one or more of the clauses in the Regulations; one or more of the clauses can be varied; and programmes can impose additional requirements.
- Exemptions are characterised by the omission of the relevant clause.
- Variations are characterised by the replacement of the clause with alternative wording.
- Additions are characterised by requirements in addition to those detailed in the Academic regulations.
The programmes listed have approval from the Academic Quality and Standards Subcommittee for the exemptions and/or variations and/or additions to the regulations noted below.
| Code of Practice for Research Degree Candidature and Supervision | Exemption/Variation/Addition | |
| 15. Progression Monitoring and Reviews | ||
| 15.5 | Progression reviews must be sufficiently rigorous to provide an adequate test of the research student’s knowledge and understanding of the subject material, of progress to date, and of plans for the remainder of their candidature. | Variation The student will be required to attend and pass two compulsory credit-bearing taught modules, selected from the CDT-QTE defined suite of modules. All components requiring summative assessment will be described within the relevant module profile.
The student will be required to attend and engage with six non-credit-bearing QTE-CDT modules to support their training and development (Scientific Skills 1 & 2, Technical Skills 1 & 2, Technical & Commercial Awareness, Commercial Skills) and undertake a 12-week industrial placement.
|
| 15.6 | Faculties will bring to the attention of students and relevant staff, clearly defined formats for the written report submission which will inform each Progression Review, and, in accordance with the requirements specified in the paragraphs below, the standard criteria to be used for defining outcomes from Progression Reviews and any additional assessment criteria specific to the student’s programme of study (which must be published in the Academic Regulations). | |
| 15.55 | An Exceptional Progression Review may be scheduled on the direction of the Faculty Director of the Graduate School if significant academic concerns about a student’s progress have been raised, either independently or through the Progression Review process. | Variation An Exceptional Progression Review will be required to assess the student’s skills and learning from the industrial placement in cases where, due to exceptional circumstances, the placement has been delayed to a time close to or after the Third Progression Review. |
These regulations should be read in conjunction with the Doctoral programme profile.
Disclaimer
As a research-led University, we undertake a continuous review of our programmes to ensure quality enhancement and to manage our resources. As a result, these regulations may be revised during a student’s period of registration, however, any revision will be balanced against the requirement that the student should receive the educational service expected. Please read our Disclaimer to see why, when and how changes may be made to a student’s programme.